The Problem
The Sphere runs a newspaper and a website, which has content roughly similar to the newspaper. People are no longer paying for the newspaper because they can read all articles on the website, which is generates revenue from digital advertising. Digital advertising however, only brings in a small percentage (15%) of the revenue necessary to support the company's costs; ads in the newspaper have traditionally brought in about 70% of the Sphere's revenue, with newspaper subscription fees bringing in the remaining 15%. The Sphere's print advertisers have realized that people aren't reading newspapers as much as they once did, and are therefore shifting their advertising dollars elsewhere, seriously impacting the largest source of revenue at the Sphere.
A metered paywall is special software code that allows website visitors to see a certain number of articles without paying, but requires the visitors pay to see additional articles.
The Sphere hopes that, by introducing a metered paywall to their website, they will encourage people to continue to buy the newspaper (thus making it more appealing to print advertisers), and get revenue from a new source: subscriptions to the website that allow visitors to see as many articles as they want.
What's an Enterprise Architect to do?
Enterprise architects need to make sure that a company's technology is aligned with its business strategy. Once the decision makers at the Sphere decide to add a metered paywall to the the website, the enterprise architect must take this information and determine how to adapt the company's technology to it. It is possible that existing technical architectures may need to change and/or new components or technologies have to be architected and built. Ideally, we do this in a systematic and disciplined way.
Usually, this involves examining and manipulating (that is changing or adding to), existing architecture "artifacts", which are usually diagrams, written documents, or models constructed using UML or some other methodology. Since the artifacts represent the company's technology, this gives the enterprise architect a way to think about what needs to be done and hopefully not forget anything. The enterprise architect can then begin discussions with business stakeholders, other enterprise architects, solution architects, development managers and developers to decide what must be done. In my opinion, an enterprise architect does not necessarily solve problems, but instead uncovers and frames them (and possibly has a recommended solution or two in mind).
It often helps if there is a sort of architectural change control process that specifies how the above happens, so that it doesn't happen in an ad hoc way every time business strategy changes.
It can be helpful to use two fairly well known approaches to deal with the artifacts and create a sort of architectural change process. The somewhat inappropriately named "Zachman Framework" is actually a taxonomy for organizing architectural artifacts, making sure they are well defined (that is, don't overlap), complete and that business requirements align with the resulting architectural designs (and the technologies that get built). The TOGAF framework is a sort of strategy for building an architectural change process, which might or might not use the Zachman Framework.
We will look at how we can use the Zachman Framework to handle the Sphere's need for a metered paywall in the next part of this series. We will look at how we can add the TOGAF framework to provide a sort of architectural change process in the third part.
Continue on to part two.
No comments:
Post a Comment